Philippe Grimbert: Secret

Stewart

Administrator
Staff member
On my regular visits to book shops there has been one book that I?ve picked up on each visit, pondered it awhile, and returned to the shelves. Not because it didn?t interest me, but because other books I picked up interested me more. However, having seen a positive review elsewhere, I decided that the next time I picked it up I wouldn?t put it down until I?d read it. So, it came to be that I read Secret (2004), by Philippe Grimbert, winner of notable French literary prizes. And besides, it?s always fun to be part of a secret.

Grimbert is by trade a psychoanalyst and it appears that for his second novel he has decided to sit himself on the couch and delve into his own family history, providing a semi-autobiographical account of growing up in post-war France. Fiction and reality are almost inseparable here as the narrator is Grimbert himself and the events are real. Secret, then, is an attempt by the author to flesh out his family history prior to his own birth, in which an unearthed secret is hidden.

Of athletic parents, Grimbert is a child of ?thinness and sickly pallor?, and begins by talking of how he invented an imaginary brother, someone older and stronger, someone he?d never become, a brother ?who would burden [him] with the full force of his weight?, to fill the hole in his world:
I always felt envious when I went to stay with a friend and a similar-looking boy walked in. The same dishevelled hair and lopsided grin would be introduced with two words: ?My brother?. An enigma, this intruder with whom everything must be shared, even love. A real brother. Someone in whose face you discovered like features: a persistently straying lock of hair, a pointy tooth? A room-mate of whom you knew the most intimate things: moods, tastes, weaknesses, smell. Exotic for me who reigned alone over the empire of my family?s four room flat.
What follows then is the realisation that buried deep in his mind, the imaginary brother has his roots in a half-brother who died before Philippe was born. The novel proceeds to tell a version of Grimbert?s family history, imagined from the bones of what he knows:
For a long time I was a young boy who dreamed of having a perfect family. I used the rare glimpses they gave me to build a picture of how my parents had met. A few incidental words about their childhood, snippets of information about their youth, their love? I pounced on these fragments to create my unlikely tale. In my own way I unwound the tangle of their lives and, much as I had invented myself a brother, created from scratch the meeting of the two bodies from which I was born, as if I were writing a novel.
By doing this he learns how his father?s first marraige spawned the half-brother, despite having always had eyes for the woman who became Grimbert?s mother. But it goes deeper than that, for after his fifteenth birthday Philippe learns ?what [he] had always known?: that his past is Jewish. His father, by deed poll, had changed their name from Grinberg to Grimbert, thus allowing him to ?plant roots deep in French soil.? Confronted on the truth he replies that ?we?ve always had that name?. And so the true nature of the Grimbert history comes to light as the author imagines what it would have been like to live in occupied France, as a Jew:
The yellow stain distinguished them to others but also allowed them to recognise each other, binding together a community that, because it was hiding itself, had sometimes not realised its own existence.
So it continues that Grimbert pieces together his family history during and after the war, taking what is known and supposing the rest, finding in his fictions reasons for why events happened as they did. And as the author works through the memory of his characters, the great secret that lies at the heart of the family is aired and the burden they represent cast aside, leading to final tragic circumstances.

Grimbert?s prose is terse, mildy poetic at times, and, along with its notion of imagining one?s family?s past, is reminiscent of Anne Enright?s The Gathering, only more optimistic, interesting, and enjoyable. At no point does the author brood on the past, each short section being a delicate meditation or revelation, culminating in the harrowing aftermath of one family?s life during wartime that is ultimately poignant in the telling. In sharing the secret of his brother Grimbert no longer needs to invent, for with the secret aired he is no longer alone.
 

tiganeasca

Moderator
[This is not new but merely a second posting in another appropriate thread.]

?? Philippe Grimbert, Memory (Un Secret) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Sympathetic resonance occurs when an object such as a violin produces a single note or a tone. Depending on its frequency, nearby objects may vibrate because they share that frequency (or a closely similar one). Thus, a string may cause other strings to vibrate and produce tones. An organ can cause windows or other glass to vibrate “sympathetically.” Even to shatter. And so it is with great books: they produce “tones”—thoughts, ideas, feelings—that resonate with the reader—with my past, my values, my thoughts. By the end of this book (and several times before), I was in tears. The writing (I presume), and certainly the translation, is measured, terse, and haunting. Grimbert’s language is understated, lyrical, nostalgic, and builds an undercurrent of disquiet that eventually leads to an emotional shattering of sorts. It is the more powerful for being largely autobiographical. The story is told (in retrospect) of the narrator’s youth in occupied France during WWII. Philippe is the fragile child of athletic and beautiful parents, a child who has always felt that he didn't fit in and that he was a disappointment. As he learns his family’s secrets, he begins to understand the critical, essential story of where he came from and who he is...and what came before him; his discoveries replace the stories and history he has constructed for himself because he learns that the past is infinitely more complex than he had imagined. I found the book wistful and bittersweet and exquisitely told. What is true and what is fiction is impossible to discern and, ultimately, irrelevant. The book, titled Un Secret in France and in England was inexplicably retitled “Memory” by its US publishers. The author’s title is far more apt. The book won the 2004 Prix Goncourt des Lycéens and was apparently an extraordinary best-seller throughout Europe; it is easy to see why. It was later made into a highly successful film; the New York Times’s review includes a description of the film that I believe is equally true about the book: “the film endows them, and everyone around them, with a dense and exquisite humanity, so that their story is freed from the pressure of making a point or teaching a lesson.” Under 150 pages, it is gem-like: polished, reflective, priceless...and shattering. I can only hope that it resonates with you and for you.
 
Top