PDA

View Full Version : Gabriel García Márquez: The Story Of A Shipwrecked Sailor



Stewart
03-Apr-2008, 12:14
Originally published as a serial in a Colombian newspaper back in 1955, The Story Of A Shipwrecked Sailor, to my surprise given other M?rquez titles, is a piece of non-fiction. It was only attributed to Gabriel Garc?a M?rquez in 1970 and tells the story of Colombian sailor, Luis Alejandro Velasco, as told to M?rquez. While the full title pretty much covers the bulk of the story (The Story of a Shipwrecked Sailor Who Drifted on a Liferaft for Ten Days Without Food or Water, Was Proclaimed a National Hero, Kissed by Beauty Queens, Made Rich Through Publicity, and Then Spurned by the Government and Forgotten for All Time) there?s a great deal of action here despite being pretty much restricted to a raft.

Leaving Alabama after eight months of repair work, the Colombian destroyer, Caldas, is heading home. Only a couple of hours from ending their journey a number of sailors are knocked overboard, their ship sailing on innocent of their loss. In the subsequent scramble the narrator Velasco recalls seeing his friends in the water with him as he fought his way to a raft. And then, one by one, they disappeared until he was alone at sea.

The next ten days are Velasco?s account of his time as his hopes of rescue abandon him, as starvation, thirst, and the sun take their toll on his mind and body, leading him to hallucinations. And that?s not all - he hunts for fish and gulls, fights against the sharks that punctually arrive each day, and saves himself when the raft overturns. Twice! It?s amazing how much action you can fit into ten days in such a confined space. But eventually, as the lengthy title states, it all comes to an end when he ends up ashore in the place he least expects: his own Colombia.

As M?rquez?s first real work, there?s little of the style that he would become famous for - and, indeed, take the 1982 Nobel Prize in Literature - and his journalistic tendencies see him reporting the account from Velasco?s perspective, adding colour where necessary, and bringing life to the page. And, despite it?s basis in fact, there?s something of the myth to it, given perhaps the solitary nature of one man?s fight for survival amidst the unforgiving sea.

The Story Of A Shipwrecked Sailor is a relatively quick read covering the stubborn will to live of one man with a positive outcome. Sprinkled amongst its pages there?s some interesting tidbits of survival and enough action to maintain such a narrative account. There?s also an emotional connection as we wonder what it?s like to be feared dead, what our families and friends must think. And given the current climate of people becoming celebrities for absolutely anything, this book shows that, no matter where these people are in the world, it?s not such a recent phenomenon after all.

Mirabell
30-Sep-2008, 09:47
to my surprise given other M?rquez titles

?

He did write quite a lot of short nonfiction pieces early in his carreer, they're collected in a huge volume in German. also, later, her returned to that form time and again, most famously in news of a kidnapping.


As M?rquez?s first real work

wasn't Leaf storm (Leaf Storm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaf_Storm)) his first "real work", a novel(la) I have heard praised many times over?

Heteronym
30-Sep-2008, 12:31
That's what I read on the cover of my Leaf Storm copy: M?rquez' first novel. Not one of my favorite works by him, though.

Mirabell, don't forget in the USA/UK M?rquez' early non-fiction hasn't been translated, if Wikipedia is to be trusted. I presume that, in the commercialization of M?rquez' name, they published The Story Of A Shipwrecked Sailor independently since it's the size of a novella and actually tells a complete story and fans will buy anything with his name on it.

Stewart
30-Sep-2008, 12:53
At the time I wrote that about being his first work, at least as far as I was aware, the Wiki page for it says,

It was originally published as a fourteen consecutive day series of installments in El Espectador newspaper in 1955; it was later published as a book in 1970, and then translated into English by Randolf Hogan in 1986.
Since Leaf Storm was also 1955, I suppose we would need to date them properly to know which came first. But does it really matter?

Mirabell
30-Sep-2008, 13:23
At the time I wrote that about being his first work, at least as far as I was aware, the Wiki page for it says,

It was originally published as a fourteen consecutive day series of installments in El Espectador newspaper in 1955; it was later published as a book in 1970, and then translated into English by Randolf Hogan in 1986.
Since Leaf Storm was also 1955, I suppose we would need to date them properly to know which came first. But does it really matter?


Leaf Storm was published 1955, but written ten years earlier. That means it DOES matter, no?

Heteronym
30-Sep-2008, 20:46
That does matter, Mirabell; but I think it matters more to know why M?rquez only published Leaf Storm ten years after he wrote it. Does anyone know?