PDA

View Full Version : André Gide



titania7
04-Oct-2008, 07:50
Before Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus, there was Andre Gide.
Always a figure of controversy, Andre-Paul-Guillaume Gide was born in Paris on November 22, 1869. He grew up in a circle of women, his father having died when Gide was quite young. Although he developed a passionate interest in literature at a young age, he despised school. Its rules and conventions repelled him. He felt such organized education stifled enthusiasm. As he wrote in If It Die, "I experienced an unspeakable distaste for everything we did in class, for class itself, for the whole system of lectures and examinations, even for the play hours...."
He did, however, have a finely developed love of nature. He took the family's maid on long walks, and later wrote of his raptures at seeing a eucalytus tree in flower (see If It Die [1924]). Gide did not begin writing until the age of eighteen, and his first works were prose poems. He may have been influenced by the literary circle he was a member of by that time--a group of young Symbolist writers including the poet, Stephan Mallarme.

Gide's first noteworthy achievement, The Fruits of the Earth, (1897), which he published at his own expense, is about a young man, Nathaniel, who rejects the common notions of morality in order to devote himself to a life of sensuality and pleasure. This hedonistic lifestyle is one that Gide personally endorsed. For, although he had been raised in a religious environment, he was anxious to throw off the shackles of Christianity. In The Immoralist (1902), Gide returns to the theme of defying convention. The protagonist, Michel, is very much a personal portrait of Gide. Like Gide, he marries a woman whom he is not in love with and suffers a tedious bout with tuberculosis. Like Gide, he finds the rigid ideas that society holds about life and religion stifling. He longs to find a "new self," and it is during his convalescence that this self comes forth, rather like a butterfly emerging from a cocoon. Gide implies that, to a large extent, Michel's awakening is brought about by his illness, writing, "to the man whom death's wing has touched, what once seemed important is so no longer; and other things become so which did once not seem important or which he did not even know existed. The layers of acquired knowledge peel away from the mind like a cosmetic and reveal, in patches, the naked flesh beneath, the authentic being hidden there." One of the repressed desires Michel becomes aware of is an attraction to men. He first becomes cognizant of this when his wife, Marceline, brings a young Arab boy home. He is beguiled by the beauty of the boy's body and by his radiant good health. As time goes on, Michel finds it infinitely more pleasurable to spend his leisure hours around young boys than around his wife, whose very presence often seems to annoy him. There is a revealing scene in chapter four (Part One) of the book when Michel sees his favorite of his wife's young boy "protegees," Moktir, steal a pair of scissors-- yet says nothing.

Apparently, Gide was attempting to suggest not only Michel's homosexuality, but also his attraction to health and unsubmissiveness in his strong fascination for the Arab children. Never is this admiration for good health and aversion to illness more clear than when Marceline (Michel's wife) becomes sick. Although he demonstrates caring and pity towards Marceline, he is inherently apathetic. At one point, when she tells him, speaking of his "doctrine" of new ideas, "It may be beautiful, but it eliminates the weak," he callously responds, "As it should." For me, one of the most memorable--and yes, even poignant--scenes in the book takes place near the end when Michel brings his wife a basket of almond blossoms. Assuming the flowers will bring her pleasure, he is astonished when, instead, the scent of them makes her ill. Frustrated and furious, he concludes, "there are strong joys for the strong, and weak joys for the weak who would be injured by the stronger ones."

The Immoralist is a novel embracing radical philosophy and passionate ideas. When I first read it, some 10+ years ago, I was too young to appreciate it. I found the story offensive, and the character of Michel unlikeable. However, re-reading it now,
many years later, I have a renewed appreciation for Gide as an artist. I admire the fervor with which he elucidates his ideas. Unlike some writers, he is not afraid to paint his philosophies in strong colors--there are no shades of grey in Gide's writing. I see, once again, why I found the other three books by Gide I have read, Strait is the Gate, Two Symphonies, and The Counterfeiters, so remarkable. Gide is not merely a brilliant writer of fiction--he is, perhaps more importantly, an extraordinary thinker.

As for Gide's personal literary influences, he claims to have always felt a strong affinity for Dostoevsky. Even as a child, he was mesmerized by the Russian author's work. He once said, "I present my own ethics under the cover of Dostoevsky."

Personally, having read almost all of Dostoevsky's major work, I fail to see the similarity between him and Gide. At the same time, I realize that it is often not easy to perceive the influence that one writer has upon another. After all, we do not know on what level Gide was affected by Dostoevsky. Perhaps it was in the formation of his ideas and the psychological aspects of his characters rather than stylistically. Again, who knows? What is of note is the momentous impact Gide has had on French literature. It is doubtful if Sartre, Camus, or de Beauvoir would have been quite the same writers had Gide not come before them. Over his lifetime, Gide, always fearful of being "classified," accepted only one prize: The Nobel Prize for Literature in 1947. Gide died on February 19, 1951.

Major works by Gide:

Tales:

The Immoralist (1902)
Strait is the Gate (1909)
Isabelle/The Pastoral Symphony (1911/1919)

Novels:

The Counterfeiters (1926)

Satirical Farces:

The Vatican Swindle (1914)

There is a fabulous site dedicated to Gide here:

http://www.andregide.org


For those of you who have not yet familiarized yourself with the writings of this master of French literature, I hope this new thread will pique your interest. Perhaps there are a few Gide fans here already?

Titania


"Envying another man's happiness is madness: you wouldn't
know what to do with it if you had it. Happiness isn't
something that comes ready-made, to order."
~The Immoralist, Andre Gide

Howard
04-Oct-2008, 11:43
The only Gide titles I've ever read - The Immoralist and The Vatican Cellars - I read so long ago I barely remember them. I've always thought of Gide less as a writer than as a great enthusiast and encourager of other writers. Being on the board of Gallimard for many years, he unquestionably had a great influence on the French literary scene. I believe I'm right in saying that he was one of the people responsible for getting Proust published, he translated Joseph Conrad into French, and he was also a great champion of one of my favourite writers, Georges Simenon, with whom he had a long and fascinating correspondence (which has been published).

Undoubtedly a major literary figure, but I wonder if many people read him these days, even in France.

Heteronym
04-Oct-2008, 12:17
I've read The Immoralist and Strait is the Gate and remained unimpressed. So little of them have stayed with me, I can barely remember them. But I remember the ennui I felt reading them. The Immoralist struck me as the worst of them because its petty attempts at shocking have no effect nowadays. Conventions and scandals don't make a good novel, their voluble nature sooner or later makes them dated.

Eric
04-Oct-2008, 13:17
It was thanks to my French teachers (probably closet gays) that I read any Gide at all, in this instance La porte ?troite (i.e. Strait is the Gate) for A-level French. Otherwise, I'm pretty sure I would never have picked up any of his books by chance in a bookshop in any language.

It's a very long time since I read that book and The Immoralist, too, but I do remember something of the self-abnegation of Alissa. I am not as dismissive of him as is Heteronym, because the young Gide was living in quite a different world to ourselves, when Symbolism was all the rage. Some of his books like The Fruits of the Earth were written in a kind of poetic style.

I don't think Gide was trying to shock with his "immorality", even though he appears to have had a penchant for young Arab boys, and would today have perhaps suffered the Gary Glitter treatment. But for publishers and critics to slot L'immoraliste into the "queer classics" pigeonhole is somewhat embarrassing. I do think, like Heteronym, that I shall not be revisiting that particular novel.

There are three important non-fiction things that Gide wrote:

Corydon, a complex treatise on homosexuality, drawing on literature, and so on.

His Diaries in several volumes, abridged into one by Penguin. Gide met quite a few interesting people and read interesting books between 1889 and 1949, which is the span of the diaries.

Return From the USSR, in which Gide tells how his eyes were opened when actually visiting the real Soviet Union in the 1930s (i.e. the main decade of Stalinist purges, show trials, and mass murder). He had been a Communist sympathiser up till then.

I find it fascinating that someone who started out so "airy-fairy" and ?sthetic (e.g. Les nourritures terrestes), ended up as a serious debunker of Russian totalitarianism in his old age.

titania7
04-Oct-2008, 22:59
Eric,
It may be that the reason I wasn't overly fond of The Immoralist when I first read it was due to the homosexuality issue. I agree with you about Gide not trying to shock by what he wrote. He was never one to "pander" to the public. The sexual proclivities of the narrator in The Immoralist were closely aligned to his own. Unfortunately, I lost my first two postings on Gide (the site logged me out). Thus, I tried to remember all I had said previously. However, I had spoken more about Gide's own sexuality in my other two posts (which, as I said, I lost). It's interesting to note that unlike Michel in The Immoralist, Gide's own marriage to Madeleine (who, incidentally, was his cousin), was never consummated. He did have an illegitimate daughter by another woman, though.

Thanks for mentioning the non-fiction works I neglected to name, Eric. Quite honestly, I was in a bit of a rush towards the end of the post (it was after 3 AM in my corner of the world), and the works I mentioned were those highlighted at andregide.org | center for gidian studies (http://www.andregide.org)

Titania

"Looking back, I imagine I was always writing. Twaddle
it was, too. But better far write twaddle or anything,
anything, than nothing at all."
~Katherine Mansfield

Eric
05-Oct-2008, 12:15
While one shouldn't obsess too much about the biographies of writers, I always feel it is instructive to know about their sexual preferences, general lifestyle, and political opinions, as some of this will be reflected in their works, however sublimated.

Some of the authors writing in the late 19th and early 20th century did indeed wrap their sexuality up in all manner of veils, if it did not coincide with the accepted public norm. But that very wrapping did make, for instance, works of Symbolism far more intriguing than if the author wore their preferences on their sleeve.

liehtzu
18-Dec-2008, 05:33
La symphonie pastorale I read in college and was floored by. It was the perfect example of taking a story that was hardly earthshattering or original and breathing power in color into it. L'immoraliste: "Achieving one's freedom is easy. The difficulty lies in knowing what to do with that freedom." (or something along those lines). A great, great book.

But the last Gide book I read was Strait is the Gate and that was a terrific slog. The story of a sensitive buffoon and his "pure" love for a religious maniac, it's one of those quaint little books where two people who have every reason to get together (not only are they both insufferable and deserving of each other, in this one they don?t even have the opposition of the parents or a war to keep them stoically apart) but because they would prefer to moon and feel sorry for themselves while spouting ludicrous drivel about preserving their "virtue" they never do, and it?s supposed to be tragic when it is in fact simply agonizingly dull. Perhaps it was the translation...

In fact, my dislike of that last book was so strong as to put me off reading Gide for awhile, despite my appreciation of those other works.

(Oh, wait, there's Fruits of the Earth standing there on the shelf...)

(Forgets entirely earlier resolution)