Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Thread: Pulitzer Prizes

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    515

    Award Pulitzer Prizes

    While it has undergone some criticism lately, the Pulitzer Prize is without a doubt the most prestigious American literary award. Out of the 10 American citizens who have gone on to win the Nobel prize, only 3 did not win the Pulitzer beforehand (Faulkner, I.B. Singer, and Joseph Brodsky, and I'm not sure if those latter two were even eligible for the prize). Clearly the prize means a lot, both in the USA and in other countries.

    The past few years a website has worked on perfected an algorithm to successfully predict the winner and in 2011 were able to accurately name A Visit From the Goon Squad as the book to earn the prize.

    You can find there predictions for this past year here:
    http://www.pprize.com/Discussions.php/2013-Prediction

    Has anyone here read any of the books on the list or have any predictions? (With Nobel prize speculation over and not set to start up again for quite some time, I need something to speculate about!)

    So far I've read Home by Toni Morrison and The Yellow Birds by Kevin Powers. Home is definitely only on the list because of Morrison's past successes as a novelist; Powers' book I thought a bit average, but at the same time I could see taking home the prize.

    If Erdrich's book (which previously won the National Book Award) wins, I could see her becoming America's best bet at having a Nobel prize winner these next few years just based off her and the Pulitzer's reputation. Unfortunately some class at my school is using the library's copy of the book, meaning it won't be available to check out until after I have gone home for the summer, but it sounds like one hell of a read from professional and Amazon reviews.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    200

    Award Pulitzer Prizes

    Since the NBCCA thread has gone largely off topic here's a thread for the Pulitzer.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    200

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    The Underground Railroad by Colson Whitehead has won the 2017 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction.

    As I predicted in the NBCCA thread, The Sport of Kings and Imagine Me Gone were both finalists.

    I guess I was wrong about Whitehead winning. It's really appalling to me that such a poorly written book is getting so much praise. The prose is elementary level and the dialogue is as well. It's written like a generic thriller and at no point is a serious discussion of slavery or the violent history of the South really explored. There's one section in the middle of the novel that's decent and somewhat covers these topics but even then, it's severely lacking and only comprises a portion of the book. The novel is gimmicky and unoriginal. It does nothing new.

    In all honesty, two well received novels about slavery were finalists, one, by a white women and one by a black man, I'm guessing politics factored into this. That or just the sheer laziness of the judges. The Underground Railroad is readable in about two hours. Whereas The Sport of Kings is far more substantial with much, much better written.

    Oh well, The Sport of Kings won the Kirkus Prize. Which is worth a lot more money.

    Both the National Book Award and Pulitzer are losing any regard I had for them as "serious" literary prizes. For the most part they're popularity contests with judges who increasingly pick the simplest, easiest book as the winner.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NYC, USA
    Posts
    4,390

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Awards are given out by people, and people are prone to making mistakes. The ultimate judge of any artist or work of art is Time. It remains to be seen if Whitehead's novel is still read in 20, 30, 50 years' time.

  5. #25

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    It wasn't that terrible of a book. I didn't love it, it is a tad bit overrated in my view, but I can see why it won the prizes. Once again, it is the kind of book that fits right in the "goldie locks" zone for literary prizes. Mainstream enough so that someone like my dad will pick it up and enjoy it, serious enough for analysis in a high school english class.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Minnesota: "icebox of America"
    Posts
    941

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    So if someone else has a different opinion than you when it comes to assessing the quality of books, they're either clueless, lazy, or politically-motivated? That sounds like sheer arrogance, my friend. And as the infallible arbiter of literary works, were you appointed or self-anointed?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    200

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Former judges of the National Book Award have pointed this out and made it an issue in editorials. I assume it's the same with the Pulitzer.

    The writing was lazy and the prose was weak. Before complaining about me why don't you read it for yourself and form an opinion on it.

    There was an entire discussion in the NBCCA Thread about American literary awards making easy/poor chocies. Why don't you go complain there? I was one of the few defending these awards in that thread.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Minnesota: "icebox of America"
    Posts
    941

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    I have not read Whitehead's novel and I have no particular interest in reading it. I'm not arguing the merits or demerits of the novel. What I take issue with is your writing in such absolutes. Clearly, you think The Underground Railroad is shit and that's fine. You're entitled to your OPINION. Continue to shout it at the top of a mountain, if you're so inclined. The arrogance comes in when you take the next step of presenting your conjecture as irrefutable fact. You clearly state Whitehead got the Pulitzer because of tokenism or because the judges were too lazy to read The Sport of Kings properly. There is a third alternative - the judges carefully read both novels and found The Underground Railroad to be superior. Perhaps, just perhaps, they're right and you're wrong or better yet - they simply came to a different conclusion than you did. Regardless, you weren't privy to those discussions and so I think it's absolute bullshit to level a charge of tokenism. It demeans the award, its judges, the winning author, and the novel itself, and, in my opinion, makes you look pretty foolish in the process.
    Last edited by Stevie B; 11-Apr-2017 at 20:30.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Guadalajara
    Posts
    5,181

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Oh Stevie, you haven't lost the touch. Thank you so much my friend.

  10. #30

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Thank you, Stevie. When I read this thread the other day I couldn't even imagine how the post announcing the winners even made it possible to have a discussion here. I mean, as you point out, there are ways to have an opinion about a book and still make space for discussion.

    Whenever I see posts on forums like the one above I am reminded of just how wretchedly reviewed Moby Dick was when it was released. Same with Les Miserables, or that, as it pertains to the Pulitzer, William Faulkner, the single most important white American writer of his century, didn't win the Pulitzer until his excellence was recognized by that weird Swedish committee which hands out medals. As Liam pointed out, the long run of time determines, largely, if something is to maintain its power. And I suspect that our posturings for intelligence on this forum will have any longterm impact on that process. As we may not ever get to see how this book is viewed in 50, 60, or 150 years, can we instead try and use language that opens up the possibility of discussion? That is, mostly, done by asking questions.

    Though I will say I am more interested in reading this book because of Isahoinp's objections. I mean, his reviews in a few of the other threads are just so damned inconsistent and confusing in their criteria that I might as well take the chance to understand something he thinks is poor literature.

    I'm not entirely thrilled by the winner. I really love Louise Erdrich and think she has consistently released incredible literature which is more than worthy of any award that is available. That said, I don't much care for the Pulitzer. For some reason, of all the major awards in the States, it is the one that intrigues me least.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    200

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    It's laughable that every year numerous members of this forum bitch and moan over the Swedish Academy giving an award to writers they don't believe deserved it, but somehow when I apply these same comments to a much lesser award it's somehow immediately considered blasphemy. There's even entire threads on Nobel "misses" or the 5 page long thread on "Nobel Screw Ups." Plenty of people on this forum insist that certain Nobel winners won the prize because of politics. Again, how is asserting that a Pulitzer winner winning for politics any more blasphemous of a statement?

    The publication of Beloved in 1987 resulted in the greatest acclaim yet for Morrison. Although nominated for the National Book Award, it did not win, and forty-eight African-American writers and critics signed a letter of protest, which was published in The New York Times

    Yes, I wonder why an awards committee would be prompted to chose an extremely popular book by a black author following two years of Black Lives Matter uprisings and numerous nation-wide protests relating to race issues in America? Especially with a white supremacist White House. What possible reason could there be? Hmm......

    I agree with Hoodoo's assessment, and considering he's apparently the only one here who's actually read the novel besides me I really don't care how awful you think my opinion on the matter is.

    As I noted in the other thread, a Pulitzer judge from the 2012 award stated that he and his fellow judges rejected a novel because they didn't believe it did anything that Toni Morrison hadn't previously covered in Beloved. I feel much the same way about this novel. So there is a precedent for rejecting it.

    There are good ideas in the book, but to me​ it falls flat in so many other levels that this doesn't matter. If anyone would like to discuss the actual merits of the novel after reading it I fell like that would be a much better topic of discussion here.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Minnesota: "icebox of America"
    Posts
    941

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Quote Originally Posted by OverTheMountains View Post
    I'm not entirely thrilled by the winner. I really love Louise Erdrich and think she has consistently released incredible literature which is more than worthy of any award that is available. That said, I don't much care for the Pulitzer. For some reason, of all the major awards in the States, it is the one that intrigues me least.
    I'm an Erdrich fan as well, though I've only read her early works. I make occasional trips down to Minneapolis and still hope to meet her some time at her book and gift shop.
    Last edited by Stevie B; 12-Apr-2017 at 03:34.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Minnesota: "icebox of America"
    Posts
    941

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Quote Originally Posted by Isahoinp View Post
    I agree with Hoodoo's assessment, and considering he's apparently the only one here who's actually read the novel besides me I really don't care how awful you think my opinion on the matter is.
    I'll get off my soap box now, Isahoinp. Though I might not agree with all of your conclusions, I appreciate your passion and your ability to generate lively debate. Keep posting.

  14. #34

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Stevie! Did you know you can order signed copies of her books off of her website? I keep on hinting to my parents that it is the only thing I want for Christmas, but they never seem to look into it. One of these days I'm going to have to go buy one myself. I've thought of driving from my hometown in Canada to Minneapolis with friends just to visit her book store and accidentally run into her.

    I'm glad I'm not to only one in the world with that silly hope. May one of us, one day, be so lucky to meet her (and report back to the other upon doing so).

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    200

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Quote Originally Posted by Stevie B View Post
    I'll get off my soap box now, Isahoinp. Though I might not agree with all of your conclusions, I appreciate your passion and your ability to generate lively debate. Keep posting.
    I'm not trying to start actual arguments or anything, I just enjoy debating the merits of literature. I will say though that I think it's silly that some of my opinions are being so poorly received when there's multiple pages long thread about how people the the Swedish Academy misjudged the Nobel Prize and how in numerous instances people have insisted laureates won because of politics.

    I'm generally one to defend literary prizes when many others are bashing them. Hell, I was defending the Pulitzer a week or so ago in the NBCCA thread.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    St. Paul, USA
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    I work in a used bookstore very near to Erdrich's store. Keep thinking she'll drop by and I'm always prepared to see her. (Been three years, though, and no such luck!)

    I'm a slow reader, and I come to these forums to keep me in the loop about what is good and what might not be. Often, when language gets expressive, it tends to rub a few people the wrong way. But that's what's important about discussions...getting the passion out. If Isahinp bashes a few books, that's fine with me. If you're drinking a beer with friends and someone says "Kafka is shit!" ('cause they can't stand cockroaches) you don't throw her out of the bar. You say "have another beer and shut up!"

    I do think that the big America awards are something to be skeptical of. They do tend to ride contemporary waves of opinion, but alas, that is what they capture...a moment in contemporary passion. A year on, something else will dominate the zeit and the geist and be the next thing to drape with perhaps undue adoration. And all of us will continue to love the books we love for reasons we often stumble in explaining.

    Onward!

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Minnesota: "icebox of America"
    Posts
    941

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Quote Originally Posted by WolfmanK View Post
    I work in a used bookstore very near to Erdrich's store. Keep thinking she'll drop by and I'm always prepared to see her. (Been three years, though, and no such luck!)
    I'm curious which used bookstore you work at. I usually visit Sixth Chamber and Magers and Quinn when I'm down in the Cities, and occasionally make it to Midway Books and The Book House.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    St. Paul, USA
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Half Price Books in St. Louis Park. Haven't been to Magers and Quinn or The Book House yet. Somewhat new to the area.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    200

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    Quote Originally Posted by WolfmanK View Post
    Half Price Books in St. Louis Park. Haven't been to Magers and Quinn or The Book House yet. Somewhat new to the area.
    It's doubtful that a famous author who owns her own independent bookstore would go to a gigantic used bookstore chain.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    St. Paul, USA
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: 2017 Pulitzer Prizes

    I think that's a strange thing to say. We're a fairly unique store. Any book-lover (even a famous book-lover with a bookstore) would be excited to come through our doors.
    Last edited by WolfmanK; 18-Apr-2017 at 08:02.

Similar Threads

  1. 16 for 2017
    By OverTheMountains in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2017, 14:45
  2. Ashokamitran (1937-2017)
    By kpjayan in forum Obituaries
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25-Mar-2017, 13:37

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •