Ben Jackson
Well-known member
This year's Nobel Prize was awarded to Salvatore Quasimodo, an Italian poet who defeated fellow Italian novelist Ignazio Silone, Ezra Pound and Karen Blixen. There were 56 writers nominated for this year's prize, with future laureates like Sartre, John Perse, Steinbeck, Andric been nominated.
Blixen had majority support from the Nobel Committee that year. As Osterling, chairman of the committee later said "if the prize should go to the 74 year old writer, it should go to her without delay." But Eyvnid Johnson, himself later a Nobel Laureate, suggested that giving the prize to Blixen would mean that the prize would be seem as Scandinavian prize. Authors from that region had won the prize four times more than other countries. He opted instead to either give the Prize to Quasimodo or Silone. Pound, on the other hand, was rejected by Dag Hammarskjold for his, as usual, fascist role in the War. Thus Blixen was rejected for "Reverse Provinicialism."
I remembered a story of when Moravia, hearing rumours that the prize that year was going to Italy, threw a wild party with the hope that he would win. Turned out it was his compatriot Quasimodo. I wondered how he could have felt.
Can't say much about Quasimodo's lyrical quality to be honest. I have read fifteen poems of him. His poems have this classical poetry vibe, with combination of hermetic style of 20th Century Italian poetry. Not in the same league with Pound, and can't put him in the same level as other great Nobel winning poets like Eliot, Montale, Transtromer, Seferis or Elytis, but not a very bad poet. Peter Englund once complained that Blixen ought to have won the Nobel. Haven't read Silone so I can't say about his chances.
Blixen had majority support from the Nobel Committee that year. As Osterling, chairman of the committee later said "if the prize should go to the 74 year old writer, it should go to her without delay." But Eyvnid Johnson, himself later a Nobel Laureate, suggested that giving the prize to Blixen would mean that the prize would be seem as Scandinavian prize. Authors from that region had won the prize four times more than other countries. He opted instead to either give the Prize to Quasimodo or Silone. Pound, on the other hand, was rejected by Dag Hammarskjold for his, as usual, fascist role in the War. Thus Blixen was rejected for "Reverse Provinicialism."
I remembered a story of when Moravia, hearing rumours that the prize that year was going to Italy, threw a wild party with the hope that he would win. Turned out it was his compatriot Quasimodo. I wondered how he could have felt.
Can't say much about Quasimodo's lyrical quality to be honest. I have read fifteen poems of him. His poems have this classical poetry vibe, with combination of hermetic style of 20th Century Italian poetry. Not in the same league with Pound, and can't put him in the same level as other great Nobel winning poets like Eliot, Montale, Transtromer, Seferis or Elytis, but not a very bad poet. Peter Englund once complained that Blixen ought to have won the Nobel. Haven't read Silone so I can't say about his chances.