nagisa
Spiky member
I was, it was a rather interesting Bourdieusian analysis of how the symbolic capital of the prize is turned into economic capital by publishing houses and editors, mostly in developed countries, on a backdrop of a statistic analysis of where authors come from, what language they write in, and to what publishing houses they attach themselves to (or are transferred to after their death); and with a macro view of how the prize generates (for better or worse) a "world literature" with all the problems of ranking it that we know. Not entirely revolutionary, but interesting.were you there? I missed her lecture " The symbolic economy of the Nobel Prize and its role in the making of World Literature". I only watched her make a question about meritocracy or something later on to another lecturer.
(An interesting tidbit: the Academy determined from the very beginning that a certain geographic "circulation" was necessary: after Prudhomme, the prize could not go right away to another French person...)
The later three talks were a bit less interesting (to us forum-users anyway; we've danced around these topics for years after all), and I actually slipped into a nap ?