Group reads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Colette Jones

Colette Jones

Reader
Just wondering, Stewart, if you'd be open to us setting up occasional group reads? I want to read more literature in translation and that would incentivise me. Apologies if this has already been brought up and disregarded.
 
Stewart

Stewart

Administrator
Staff member
Yes, it's a worthwhile idea. I didn't see the point in setting one up straight away because you need interested parties first. So, interested parties?
 
LizzySiddal

LizzySiddal

Reader
Surely the first WLF group read is Ammaniti's new one - in preparation for the Q&A? To be scheduled once we've received our copies.
 
Stewart

Stewart

Administrator
Staff member
LizzySiddal said:
Surely the first WLF group read is Ammaniti's new one - in preparation for the Q&A? To be scheduled once we've received our copies.
Click to expand...
Beyond that, there's so many more months. I can set up a specific 'Book Group' area. How would others think it would be best orchestrated? I've never taken part in a book group in my life.
 
Stewart

Stewart

Administrator
Staff member
I was thinking some more about this over lunch. How about following an A is for Albanian/Austrian/etc, B is for Bulgaria/Bermuda/etc. pattern.
 
abecedarian

abecedarian

Reader
Stewart said:
I was thinking some more about this over lunch. How about following an A is for Albanian/Austrian/etc, B is for Bulgaria/Bermuda/etc. pattern.
Click to expand...


Would we all be reading the same title or just going with the theme country? The latter might be fun.
 
Last edited:
Colette Jones

Colette Jones

Reader
I prefer all reading the same book, as I believe there is more to discuss then. It doesn't have to be monthly or decided very far in advance. In fact, I think it works best if someone puts out an idea and it is somewhat spur of the moment.

Definitely the Ammaniti first, and in the mean time people could make suggestions for the next book. Like Bernhard Schlink Self's Punishment... or Jose Carlos Somoza The Art of Murder anyone?
 
LizzySiddal

LizzySiddal

Reader
Mirabell said:
I have initiated a second one, on Thomas Mann's Royal Highness. Sybarite signed up.
Click to expand...


I'll sign up too, provided the read is scheduled after the Ammaniti Q&A.

Didn't respond to the Goethe invite .... I still bear the scars from Torquato Tasso ....
 
lionel

lionel

Reader
Mirabell said:
yep. I tried to set up one already, on Goethe's Wilhelm Meister novels, but lionel the only fixed member dropped out, so there.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but I think I had a reasonable reason: Goethe didn't seem to translate that well. I tried, but was sweating like hell. Be fair, Mirabell: from what you told me, he doesn't even translate well in his own language. :p
 
B

Beth

Reader
Sounds good here as well. Alphabetical pattern seems a nice orderly way to choose without too much difficulty.
 
Jayaprakash

Jayaprakash

Reader
Mirabell: I'm ready to take on Royal Highness anytime you'd care to initiate the group read. Three is a sufficient number - I find that forum-wide group reads, while nice, can have mixed results. The discussions become a bit too wide-ranging- every opinion is expressed by someone or the other and there's no room for the nicely fraught subjectivity of a handful of people opining and getting on one another's nerves.
 
Colette Jones

Colette Jones

Reader
Jayaprakash said:
Mirabell: I'm ready to take on Royal Highness anytime you'd care to initiate the group read. Three is a sufficient number - I find that forum-wide group reads, while nice, can have mixed results. The discussions become a bit too wide-ranging- every opinion is expressed by someone or the other and there's no room for the nicely fraught subjectivity of a handful of people opining and getting on one another's nerves.
Click to expand...
I agree - a handful gets more "real" discussion going. I looked up Royal Highness and see that it is not available new, which means buying used, which always disappoints me, especially from amazon.
 
Mirabell

Mirabell

Former Member
lionel said:
Yeah, but I think I had a reasonable reason: Goethe didn't seem to translate that well. I tried, but was sweating like hell. Be fair, Mirabell: from what you told me, he doesn't even translate well in his own language. :p
Click to expand...

so 'tis indeed.
 
Mirabell

Mirabell

Former Member
alternatively, we could do the Joseph cycle, apparently newly translated in the wonderful Everyman's hardcover

Amazon.com: Joseph and His Brothers: The Stories of Jacob, Young Joseph, Joseph in Egypt, Joseph the Provider: Thomas Mann, John E. Woods: Books

?This excellent new translation by John E. Woods is a cause for celebration: first, because Joseph and His Brothers is in fact a great novel that will now be discovered by a new generation of readers; and second, because Woods himself is to be credited with an extraordinary achievement . . . Woods tackles the challenges of Mann?s wide-ranging diction with exuberance . . . Mann has finally found his ideal English translator.? ?New Republic,Ruth Franklin
 
Colette Jones

Colette Jones

Reader
A mere 1400+ pages! Yikes. I'm back to Royal Highness now, at 320 pages, and I have discovered, available at my library!

Maybe we should do a bit of selling the choices - why do you suggest Royal Highness, Mirabell? Note how I am ignoring Joseph and His Brothers - but rest assured I have lots of songs from The Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat going around in my head...

...
Jacob, Jacob and sons,
Depended on farming to earn their keep.
Jacob, Jacob and sons,
Spend all of his days in the fields with sheep.
...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top