Liam
Administrator
@nagisa: Remember, Leseratte is from Brazil and English is not his/her first language. He/she may have simply chosen the wrong words. Next time ask them to elaborate and if the elaboration is not to your liking, THEN you can start a discussion and point out faulty thinking,
I know, it's rich coming from me, as I did the same thing time and time again, but this was years ago before I became forum admin.
@Leseratte: I think what nagisa is trying to point out is that, although "Japanese subtlety" may seem like a compliment, it should not apply to an entire group of people, because that is, as he said, "essentialist."
I am simplifying a lot, but modern scholarship/critical theory has a huge problem with essentialism, for good reason.
So basically when you say something like "All Russians are moody" or "All Brazilians are temperamental" or "All Finns are alcoholics," you are casting an entire group of people as something or other thereby denying them individuality.
Even compliments can be essentialist as in: "All women are beautiful." Because essentialism is a two-way street, theorists have been politely asking not to engage in it, whether negatively OR positively, to avoid among other things: racism, sexism, etc.
The examples I provided above can be read as both essentialist AND racist/sexist--never mind that the sentence about women is disguised as a compliment!
Anyway, I think THIS is what nagisa is trying to point out, but I don't want to put words in his mouth, so... I'll leave it at that,
PS. I think you meant "Japanese subtlety" as a compliment, btw. I sometimes catch myself doing the same thing, as in: "All Russian literature is DARK..."
I know, it's rich coming from me, as I did the same thing time and time again, but this was years ago before I became forum admin.
@Leseratte: I think what nagisa is trying to point out is that, although "Japanese subtlety" may seem like a compliment, it should not apply to an entire group of people, because that is, as he said, "essentialist."
I am simplifying a lot, but modern scholarship/critical theory has a huge problem with essentialism, for good reason.
So basically when you say something like "All Russians are moody" or "All Brazilians are temperamental" or "All Finns are alcoholics," you are casting an entire group of people as something or other thereby denying them individuality.
Even compliments can be essentialist as in: "All women are beautiful." Because essentialism is a two-way street, theorists have been politely asking not to engage in it, whether negatively OR positively, to avoid among other things: racism, sexism, etc.
The examples I provided above can be read as both essentialist AND racist/sexist--never mind that the sentence about women is disguised as a compliment!
Anyway, I think THIS is what nagisa is trying to point out, but I don't want to put words in his mouth, so... I'll leave it at that,
PS. I think you meant "Japanese subtlety" as a compliment, btw. I sometimes catch myself doing the same thing, as in: "All Russian literature is DARK..."