hayden
Well-known member
?
I know, I know...
Woops.
She was genuinely written off for me. I didn't see that coming at all.
Library has 17 of her works. Who knows, maybe in a few years she’ll be in consideration.
But an adviser to the prize-giving committee denied this in an email on Wednesday. “We haven’t focused on making a ‘safe’ pick or discussed the choice in such terms,” said Rebecka Karde, a journalist and one of three external experts who helped choose this year’s winner. “It’s all about the quality of the output of the writer who gets it.”
I miss Sara Danius. Mats Malm has the incomparable charisma of a potato.
Glück: Your two minutes are over.I suppose many of you have already heard this conversation. I really liked her persona, and how she is concerned about her personal life and dear ones (and also how she frankly talked about the practical side of the award ? ). Hm, after all those politically and socially active writers, here we get someone who cherishes personal seclusion.
I am, as always, happy that it's a poet!
Even for a Swede, that was grey ?These have never exactly been high energy announcements, but seriously, Malm sounded like he was in the middle of a depressive episode
Was I the only one, expecting a second name after Glück was mentioned? Those damn "s" at the tweets made me believe we could have a joint award.
I tried.
Ran out of authors I legitimately thought could win near the end as I still doubt Mantel or Robinson will/have actually been considered. The same with Kincaid and Conde. Several of the older perennials I really don’t think have any shot (Byatt, O’Brien, Oates, etc)
2021: Annie Ernaux
2022: Can Xue
2023: Anne Carson (they reassess her and decide “why not?”)
2024: Friederike Mayrocker (a 100th birthday present)
2025: Han Kang
2026: Lyudmila Ulitskaya
2027: Xi Xi
2028: ?
2029: ?
Stevie, you know I love, and have always loved, Mary Oliver. I haven't read enough of Gluck to compare (or contrast) them against each other, so I simply don't know. Had Mary Oliver won, it would have been a most deserving choice, in my opinion.I'm curious, Liam, if Oliver hadn't passed away a couple of years ago, would you have preferred her winning to Glück?
As for Glück, I remember back in the beginning of the year on the (now defunct) Nobel library thread, I happened to have searched her name and noticed a vast number of titles checked out, after which Marba mentioned she had just won the Tranströmer Prize, of which Wästberg is a juror, so it could have been him checking those books for the purposes of the aforementioned award; so I guess that diminished the talk around her a bit...@Isahoinp I have a question for you. The Nobel library has a huge, I mean a huge collection of authors. How did you narrow down your search to such a small number? As far as I remember, no one was seriously considering Gluck (except one or two, but she never got momentum, and sorry for the misspelling), I mean, unlike Carson or Can Xue, Simic, even I suppose people here talked about Kincaid more than her, but you did look her up. Any insight you want to share?
He was talking about women with considerable books checked out from the library. I know he wouldn’t, but I’d put Robinson in there, maybe there’ll even be time enough for another novel, who knows. A highly deserving winner she would be.and add Duong Thu Huong
I literally went through every entry in the Library’s catalogue by author. So it wasn’t really any sort of intellectual feat. Just a dreary 3 days straight of clicking and Googling.
Relax. If all goes well, and they don’t keep changing permanent secretaries as they have recently every couple of years, y’all will probably “only” have to endure his listless character for some 8 years more ?These have never exactly been high energy announcements, but seriously, Malm sounded like he was in the middle of a depressive episode
These have never exactly been high energy announcements, but seriously, Malm sounded like he was in the middle of a depressive episode